TECHNICAL PROBLEMS IN THE REVIEWING OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION IN LIEU OF LAW (PERPPU) AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i3.414Keywords:
the loss of reviewing object, legal certainty, PERPPUAbstract
The need for formal legal sources in constitutional activities in public life cannot be ascertained due to a country's dynamics and political conditions. It is still also related to the need for regulatory provisions that align with current conditions. Government Regulations in Lieu of Law (PERPPU) are issued by the President in response to compelling urgencies, leveraging his constitutional authority to enact such regulations. Since PERPPU is a subjective product of the President, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution, it must be immediately reviewed by The House of Representatives (DPR) for approval or revoked if rejected. With the issuance of the PERPPU, certain parties may undoubtedly feel constitutionally disadvantaged. In such cases, the way that can be taken is to conduct a judicial review of the Constitutional Court as has been established in legal precedent. This research includes legal research. It is called legal research because the object of research is related to law. The type of research used is normative juridical. The approaches used in this research are the statute, conceptual, and case approaches. The results showed that many cases of PERPPU reviewing at the Constitutional Court lost the object of reviewing because it was enacted into law by the DPR. The loss of reviewing object PERPPU reviewing at the Constitutional Court becomes a technical problem in PERPPU reviewing that must be anticipated in the procedure for reviewing at the Constitutional Court.
References
Alrasyid, H. (2004). Hak Menguji dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jurnal Konstitusi, I(1).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Hukum Tata Negara Darurat. Rajawali Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Makalah (Http://Www. Jimly. Com/Makalah/Namafile/57/Konsep_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia. Pdf). Diakses Pada Hari Rabu, 13. http://www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/57/Konsep_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia.pdf
Hadjon, P. M. (1994). Fungsi Normatif Hukum Administrasi dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Bersih. Pidato Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Ilmu Hukum Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Huda, N. (2003). Politik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. FH UII Press.
Huda, N. (2010). Pengujian Perppu oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5). https://www.neliti.com/publications/107923/pengujian-perppu-oleh-mahkamah-konstitusi
Huda, N. (2016). Problematika Substantif Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1041
Ketetapan MPR Nomor III/MPR/2000 tentang Sumber Hukum dan Tata Urutan Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Kelsen, H. (1978). Pure Theory of Law. University of California Press.
Mahfud MD, M. (2010). Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. Rajawali Press.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2023). Risalah Sidang Perkara 40, 41, 46, 50/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar .
Manan, B. (1999). Lembaga Kepresidenan. Gama Media.
Mannan, B. (1992). Dasar-Dasar Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Indo Hill Co.
Martosoewignjo, S. S. (1987). Prosedur dan Sisten Perubahan Konstitusi. Alumni.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revi). Prenada Media Group.
Marzuki, P. M. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Prenada Media Group.
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Peraturan MK Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Beracara Pengujian Undang-Undang
Peraturan MK Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Tata Beracara Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden
Putusan MK Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009 tentang Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Pengujian PERPPU Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Putusan MK 54/2023 54/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja
Putusan MK 43/2020 pengujian UU No 2 tahun 2020 tentang penetapan PERPPU No 1 tahun 2020 tentang kebijakan keuangan negara dan stabilitas system keuangan untuk penanganan pandemi corona virus disease (Covid-19)
Sirajuddin, & Winardi. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Setara Press.
Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-undangan I (Edisi Revi). Kanisius.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Wibowo, M. (2020). Asas-Asas Pengujian Undang-Undang. Rajawali Press.
Zakaria, E. H. P. (2019). LEGISLATIVE REVIEW DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG. Lex Administratum, VII(1), 62–70. https://www.infodesign.org.br/infodesign/article/view/355%0Ahttp://www.abergo.org.br/revista/index.php/ae/article/view/731%0Ahttp://www.abergo.org.br/revista/index.php/ae/article/view/269%0Ahttp://www.abergo.org.br/revista/index.php/ae/article/view/106%0A
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 IBLAM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IBLAM Law Review by https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/index is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
