Legal Analysis of the Relationship between BPN Decree Number 3/Pbt.36/III/2023 and Supreme Court Decision Number 250 PK/Pdt/2004 Jo. 82/Pdt.G/1997/PN.TNG in the Cancellation of Transfer of Land Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.602Abstract
The legal conflict between BPN Decree Number 3/Pbt.36/III/2023 and Supreme Court Decision Number 250 PK/Pdt/2004 Jo. 82/Pdt.G/1997/PN.TNG creates uncertainty in the implementation of land rights that should have been resolved through the courts. This problem shows the disharmony between the administrative authority of the land institution and the permanent legal force possessed by the court decision. When a court decision that has permanent legal force is not respected by the administrative institution, there is a vacuum of legal protection for parties who have legally obtained their rights. Therefore, this study is important because it concerns the principle of res judicata and the obligation of state administrative institutions, in this case BPN, to submit to and obey court decisions that are final and binding. This study uses a normative legal approach method with qualitative analysis techniques on various relevant legal instruments. Data were collected through literature studies and analyzed descriptively-analystically. The results of the study indicate that the BPN's action in issuing Decree Number 3/Pbt.36/III/2023 is a form of ultra vires, because it directly contradicts the Supreme Court Decision which has permanent legal force. This can be qualified as a form of abuse of authority that not only violates the principle of legality, but also damages the authority of the judicial institution. As a result, this situation opens up opportunities for the aggrieved party to take legal action through administrative objections, lawsuits to the State Administrative Court (TUN), or reports to the Indonesian Ombudsman for alleged maladministration. In conclusion, harmonization between land administration law and civil procedural law is very necessary to ensure the consistency of legal decisions and administrative actions, in order to realize legal certainty, protection of rights, and substantive justice in the national land system.
References
Amalia, A. (2024). Hukum Agraria dan Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah,. Widina Utama Media.
Ammarohman Fauzi Janu, witjaksono F. O.-O. (2021). Buku Ajar Hukum Agraria. Undip Press.
Azhar, K. B. dan M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7.
Gayatri, Seputra, S. (2021). Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Akibat Cacat Administrasi. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(1), 79-83.
Irwansyah. (2022). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Kotalino, Jacklyn Samantha, Y. Maarthen, and M. L. L. (2023). Analisis Kasus Terhadap Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 33/G/2014/Ptun. Mdo). Lex Administratum, 11(3).
Leksono, U. (2019). Pembatalan Hak Milik Atas Tanah.". SPEKTRUM HUKUM, 16(1).
Prastuti, B. N. (2021). PEMBATALAN PERALIHAN HAK KARENA PUTUSAN PIDANA PENGADILAN NEGERI KOTA YOGYAKARTA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor 63/Pid/B/1991/PN. YK).". Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional.
Putri, Lidya Dwi, A. R. N. (2024). Pelindungan Bank sebagai Pemegang Hak Tanggungan terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah yang Dibatalkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional Akibat Putusan Pengadilan (Studi Kasus PT X). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(9).
Rabbani, M. F. A., Adymas, M., & Fikri, H. (2025). Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah di Indonesia Cakra Putra Negara Universitas Negeri Semarang. 2(1), 211–220.
Rosalinda, F. (2023). Legal Consequences of Violating the Obligations of Prospective Intern Notary: A Study of Legislation Akibat. 5(1), 59–73.
Saida Flora, H. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, XIX(57), 179–199.
Santi. (2024). ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PENCATATAN PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH BERDASARKAN AKTA HIBAH (Studi Kasus Keputusan Kepala Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional Provinsi Jawa Tengah Nomor 02/Pbt/BPN-33/I/2024). UII.
Sari, N. L. A. (2020). “PEMBATALAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH ATAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN.” GANEC SWARA, 14(2).
Satriadiana, I. D. P. (2019). Analisis Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Mataram Nomor 52/G/2010/Ptun. Mtr Terhadap Pembatalan Sertifikat Pengganti Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(2).
Syazali, E. A. (2018). Kepastian Hukum Akta Jual Beli Tanah Pada Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan. Jurnal Yuridis UNAJA, 1(2), 1–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IBLAM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IBLAM Law Review by https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/index is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
