The Urgency of Regulating Asset Recovery at the District Attorney Level to Ensure the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Corruption Crimes

The Urgency of Regulating Asset Recovery at the District Attorney Level to Ensure the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Corruption Crimes

Authors

  • Fredi Wahyu Putra Adhyaksa Brawijaya University
  • Prija Djatmika Brawijaya University
  • Fachrizal Afandi Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i1.641

Keywords:

asset recovery, exclusionary rules, corruption crimes

Abstract

Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime that requires extraordinary measures. One important strategy is asset recovery to compensate for state losses. However, the absence of explicit regulations regarding the principle of exclusionary rules in Indonesian positive law has caused disharmony between theory and practice. Purposes of the Research:  This study aims to analyze the implications of asset recovery regulations on the application of exclusionary rules in the enforcement of criminal acts of corruption. Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach, focusing on the analysis of regulations and the authority of the District Attorney's Office related to asset recovery.  Results / Main Findings / Novelty/Originality of the Research:The results of the study show that the lack of regulations and SOPs at the District Attorney's Office level has the potential to weaken the legitimacy of law enforcement. This condition emphasizes the need for comprehensive regulations that explicitly include the principle of exclusionary rules. In addition, the establishment of an Asset Recovery Section in the District Attorney's Office is necessary to ensure effectiveness, legal certainty, and justice in combating corruption.

References

Alfitra. (2014). Modus operandi pidana khusus di luar KUHP: Korupsi, money laundering, & trafficking. Raih Asa Sukses.

Arianto, A. F. (2024). Peran lembaga penegak hukum dalam proses perampasan aset. USM Law Review, 7(3), 1601. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.10516

Amir, C. (2014). Kejaksaan memberantas korupsi: Suatu analisis historis, sosiologis, dan yuridis. Deleader.

Karinda, F. J., Kristiawanto, K., & Ismed, M. (2022). Upaya pemulihan aset pelaku tindak pidana korupsi guna mengoptimalisasi kerugian keuangan negara. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(6), 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27688

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Naskah akademik rancangan undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

Maulidah, K., & Sari, R. K. (2024). The urgency of the follow the money approach in law enforcement efforts against money laundering resulting from corruption. Sapientia et Virtus: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika, 9(2), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v9i2.539

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Nasution, A. A., & Riswadi, R. (2024). Legal reconstruction of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture for state loss recovery from corruption crimes. Return, 3(11), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.57096/return.v3i11.293

Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode penelitian ilmu hukum. Mandar Maju.

Padlilah, Ravena, D., Zakaria, C. A. F., & Mulyana, A. (2023). Reevaluation and reorientation of the philosophy of retributive justice to restorative justice in imposing criminal sanctions. Journal La Sociale, 4(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i2.786

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Adhyaksa, F. W. P., Djatmika, P., & Afandi, F. (2026). The Urgency of Regulating Asset Recovery at the District Attorney Level to Ensure the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Corruption Crimes . IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 6(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i1.641
Loading...