Pengaturan Hukum terhadap Hak Kreditur Konkuren yang Dirugikan dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum yang Transparan dan Berkeadilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i3.647Keywords:
reconstruction, concurrent creditors, law enforcement, justice and transparencyAbstract
In Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, there are still legal restrictions governing the rights of concurrent creditors. There are many conclusions which are the result of the unregulated rights of concurrent creditors which give rise to many new problems. The main objective in a process before the court is to obtain a judge's decision that has permanent legal force, but in bankruptcy cases, concurrent creditors often do not receive certainty and fair legal enforcement. The method used in this research is normative juridical by conducting research through literature on secondary data, especially primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in articles or journals, using the theory of just legal certainty. The results of research provide insight and direction to fill the legal vacuum in the regulation of concurrent creditor rights by including transparency and input into elements of special institutions that manage and determine bankruptcy assets in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.
References
Abdul R. Saliman, et al., Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, Teori dan Contoh Kasus, (Jakarta:
Kencana, 2004)
Adrian Sutedi, Hukum Perbankan; Suatu Tinjauan Pencucian Uang, Merger, Likuidasi, dan
Kepailitan, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007)
Ahmad Yani dan Gunawan Widjaja, Seri Hukum Bisnis, Kepailitan, (Jakarta: Raja
Grafindo Persada, 2002)
Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang, UU
No. 37 Tahun 2004, LN No.131 Tahun 2004, TBN No. 4443
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Pasal 1131-1132.
Mizan, Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. Volume 4 No 2 Desember 2016. ISSN: 2089-032X - 338
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Hukum Kepailitan; Memahami Faillissementsverordening Juncto
Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1998, (Jakarta: PT Temprint, 2002)
Naihasy, Syahrin, Hukum Bisnis (Business Law), (Yogyakarta: Mida Pustaka, 2005)
Rolend Santoso, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.
/puu-xi/2013 tentang Uji Materi Pasal 95 Ayat 4 UU No. 13 Tahu UIB
Repository (c) 2015.
Putusan Penetapan No.: 01/PKPU/2003/PN Niaga. Jkt. Pst jo. No:
/PAILIT/2002/PN. Niaga.Jkt. Pst. Tanggal 9 Maret 2003.
Rolend Santoso, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.
/puu-xi/2013 tentang Uji Materi Pasal 95 Ayat 4 UU No. 13 Tahu UIB
Repository (c) 2015.
Sunarmi, Hukum KepailitanEdisi 2, (Jakarta: Sofmedia, 2013)
Undang-Undang Dasar NRI Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang PKPU dan Kepailitan
Van Apeldoorn, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1990)
Victor Situmorang & Soekarso, Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta, 1994), h. 18.
Zaeny Asyhadie, Hukum Bisnis Proses dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada, 2005), h. 225.
Zainal Asikin, Hukum Kepailitan&Penundaan Pembayaran Di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Rajawali
Pers, 2002)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IBLAM LAW REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IBLAM Law Review by https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/index is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International



