Modern Approaches to Dispute Resolution: Ad Hoc and Institutional Mediation in Asia and Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i1.670Keywords:
ad hoc mediation, private institutional mediation, dispute resolution, asia, africa, alternative dispute resolution, mediation effectivenessAbstract
Ad hoc and private institutional mediation are two forms of modern approaches to dispute resolution that are increasingly developing in Asia and Africa. These two approaches offer effective alternatives to conventional litigation systems with the advantages of flexibility, time efficiency, and lower costs. Ad hoc mediation gives the parties the freedom to appoint a mediator without being tied to a particular institution, while private institutional mediation provides a structured and professional framework through a credible mediation institution. In Asia, the success of institutional mediation is driven by supportive regulations and increased mediator capacity, with dispute resolution rates between 40% and 70%. In Africa, the integration of mediation with local wisdom and indigenous cultures increases the success rate of mediation to 50% to 65%. The implementation of these two approaches within a progressive legal framework shows that ad hoc and private institutional mediation not only reduce the burden on the judicial system but also improve access to justice in a more equitable and civilized manner. These approaches represent the evolution of harmonious and equitable dispute resolution in Asia and Africa, providing strategic solutions to current and future legal challenges.
References
African Journal of Legal Studies, 12(2), 145–163.
Abduh, M. (2025). Mediasi Elektronik sebagai Sarana Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Era Digital. Jurnal Ahwaluna Vol. 1.
Born, Gary B. (2014). International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.
Boulle, L. (2011). Mediation: Skills and Techniques. LexisNexis Butterworths.
Daulay, A. I., & Hakim, F. (2025). Hambatan dan Solusi dalam Implementasi Mediasi sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa. Journal of Dual Legal Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1.
De Palo, G., & Trevor, G. (2018). Mediation and ADR in Africa: The Role of Culture and Law. African Law Review, 7(1).
Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2010). Asian legal revivals: Lawyers in the shadow of empire. University of Chicago Press.
Dharmasisya. (2024). Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Afrika Selatan. Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI.
El-Gazzar, H. (2019). The Role of Mediation in Egypt and North Africa. Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration Reports.
Gadkari, R. (2020). Court-Annexed Mediation in India: A Success Story. Indian Journal of Law and Society, 11(2).
Hidayat, R. (2023). Efektivitas mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Manna dalam perkara perceraian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 145–158.
Huala Adolf. (2018). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kencana. International Arbitration Attorney. (2019). Arbitrase Institusional atau Ad-Hoc? Kuncihukum.com. (2024). Kenali 6 Sistem Hukum yang Berlaku di Dunia!
Lam, M. (2024). Implementasi dan Tantangan Mediasi Elektronik di Pengadilan. Jurnal Sistem Hukum dan Layanan Publik.
Lanz, D. (2019). Mediation in Africa: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. African Peace and Security Review, 7(3), 25–40.
Lestari, R. (2024). Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 3 No.2.
Liew, K. (2021). Institutional Mediation in Asia: Development and Future Challenges. Asian Dispute Review, Vol. 23.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2022). Laporan tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: MA RI.
Moore, Christopher W. (2014). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. Jossey-Bass.
Morishima, Y. (2019). Japanese Approaches to Mediation and Conciliation. Journal of East Asian Law, 12(3).
Moses, Margaret L. (2017). Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. Cambridge University Press.
Muladi. (2002). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Murithi, T. (2009). An African perspective on peace education: Ubuntu lessons in reconciliation. International Review of Education, 55(2-3), 221–233.
Muthuri, J. N., & Mutula, S. M. (2016). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Africa: Mediation, Arbitration, and Negotiation. Pan African Publishers.
Nathan, L. (2020). The effectiveness of African-led mediation in armed conflicts. Conflict Trends, 2020(1), 12–20.
News report: Reuters coverage of the establishment of an international mediation body in Hong Kong (May 2025) as an example of the latest geopolitical and institutional developments. (Reuters)
Nolan-Haley, J. (2012). Mediation and access to justice in Africa: Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms in context. Fordham International Law Journal, 36(2), 285–328.
Nurnaningsih Amriani. (2012). Mediation: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
OECD. (2019). Mediation in Commercial Disputes: A Global Perspective. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Prayogo, S. (2022). Mediasi perdata di pengadilan: Tantangan implementasi Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(3), 355–370.
Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. McGraw-Hill.
Raharjo, A. (2020). Praktik Mediasi di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1).
Referensi
Reports and studies on the impact of COVID-19 on mediation and the shift to online mediation (e.g., SSRN, practical law). (SSRN)
Singapore Management University (SMU). (2024). International survey on mediation and dispute resolution. Singapore: SMU.
Sourdin, T. (2020). Alternative dispute resolution. Thomson Reuters.
Strong, S. I. (2020). Beyond international commercial arbitration? The promise of international commercial mediation. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 64, 11–38.
Susskind, Lawrence & Cruikshank, Jeffrey. (2010). Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. Basic Books.
Sutanto, B. (2025). Evaluasi efektivitas mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 15(1), 101–117.
Sutiyoso, B. (2019). Mediasi dalam sistem peradilan perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2), 312–331.
Suyud Margono. (2000). ADR: Alternative Dispute Resolution dan Arbitrase di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sweeney, B. (2018). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Asia: Mediation and Conflict Resolution Mechanisms. Asia-Pacific Journal on Conflict Resolution, 25(2), 134–150.
Tan, C. H., & Yeo, H. (2020). Singapore’s Role in International Mediation. Asian International Arbitration Journal, 16(2).
Tang, M., & Brown, H. (2017). Mediation in China: Law and Practice. Oxford University Press.
UNCITRAL, Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (2018 revision) and Mediation Rules. (uncitral.un.org)
UNCTAD. (2020). Dispute Resolution and Investment in Developing Countries: Trends in Asia and Africa. Geneva.
United Nations / Treaty Collection United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention) (adopted 2018; opened for signature 7 Aug 2019). (treaties.un.org)
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). (2019). United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (2019). Singapore Convention on Mediation. United Nations Treaty Collection.
Usman, R. (2012). Mediasi di Pengadilan dalam Teori dan Praktik. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Widodo, T. (2023). Analisis tingkat keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto. Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia, 9(2), 221–235.
Yong, C. (2021). Mediation in Asia: Developments and challenges. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 8(1), 77–96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IBLAM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IBLAM Law Review by https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/index is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
