Closing the Justice Gap in Digital Finance Services through Online Dispute Resolution
Keywords:
online dispute resolution, digital financial services, access to justiceAbstract
Despite the rapid expansion of digital financial services, existing legal frameworks have not adequately addressed the widening access to justice gap in digital financial disputes. The growth of these services has expanded public access to financial products, but also created increasingly complex disputes between consumers and financial service providers. Conventional dispute resolution mechanisms remain limited in responding to the characteristics of digital transactions, which are fast, cross-platform, and technology-driven. This article examines the potential of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as a mechanism to strengthen consumer protection and legal certainty in digital financial disputes. The research uses a normative legal approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods. It analyzes the suitability of the existing legal framework with the needs of dispute resolution in the digital era and the prospects for integrating ODR into the financial services dispute resolution system. The study finds that current mechanisms are still constrained by accessibility, efficiency, and responsiveness. ODR offers a more accessible, efficient, and timely alternative while maintaining fairness and legal accountability. Therefore, strengthening the legal and institutional foundations of ODR is essential to narrow the justice gap
References
Cortés, P. (2017). The law of consumer redress in an evolving digital market: Upgrading from alternative to online dispute resolution. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.11.007
Ibrahim, J. (2020). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital justice: Reshaping boundaries in an online dispute resolution environment. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 4(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.5553/IJODR/235250022017004001002
Lestari, N. P. A., & Suryani, E. (2023). Efektivitas LAPS-SJK dalam penyelesaian sengketa sektor jasa keuangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.601
Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2019). Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 27(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9235-9
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Poblet, M., & Casanovas, P. (2020). Blockchain and dispute resolution: A new paradigm of trust? Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105375
Pratiwi, A. M., & Haryanto, E. (2022). Perlindungan konsumen dalam layanan fintech peer-to-peer lending di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(3), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss3.art4
Putra, A. P., & Arifin, R. (2021). Legal protection for consumers in fintech transactions in Indonesia. Unnes Law Journal, 7(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.15294/jh.v7i2.48215
Ramli, R., & Nugraha, X. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi fintech di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(2), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no2.3456
Rule, C. (2020). Online dispute resolution and the future of justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020620-104651
Schmitz, A. J., & Rule, C. (2017). The new handshake: Online dispute resolution and the future of consumer protection. University of Illinois Law Review, 2017(1), 199–260. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903728
Sihotang, H., & Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Online dispute resolution (ODR) sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di era digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 10(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.707
Susanti, D. O., & Nugroho, A. S. (2020). Urgensi pengaturan online dispute resolution dalam penyelesaian sengketa e-commerce di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.599
Susskind, R. (2019). Online courts and the future of justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042928
Wibowo, A., & Susanti, D. O. (2021). Penyelesaian sengketa konsumen melalui LAPS-SJK dalam perspektif perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i3.789
Wing, L. (2016). Online dispute resolution: Developments and issues. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 3(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.5553/IJODR/235250022016003001003
Zeleznikow, J. (2021). Using artificial intelligence to provide intelligent dispute resolution support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(4), 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09724-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IBLAM LAW REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IBLAM Law Review by https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/index is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International



