Daughters' Inheritance Rights: Indonesian Legal Paradigms, Human Rights, and a Comparative Analysis with India and Pakistan

Daughters' Inheritance Rights: Indonesian Legal Paradigms, Human Rights, and a Comparative Analysis with India and Pakistan

Authors

  • Maftuha Kiswah Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i2.694

Keywords:

inheritance rights, legal pluralism, human rights, CEDAW, maqaṣid al-shariah, adat law, gender equality, indonesia, india, pakistan

Abstract

This article examines daughters’ inheritance rights from a human rights perspective in Indonesia through a comparative analysis with India and Pakistan. Indonesia’s inheritance law is shaped by legal pluralism, consisting of Western Civil Law, Islamic Law under the Compilation of Islamic Law, and diverse customary laws. Using a normative juridical method with a Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) and case-law analysis, this article evaluates how legal reforms, judicial decisions, and interpretive developments affect women’s substantive inheritance rights in the three jurisdictions. The findings show that legal reform without cultural transformation, as seen in India’s Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005, may produce unintended consequences, including increased sex-selective abortion and female infant mortality. In contrast, Indonesia’s gradual jurisprudential development, reflected in Supreme Court Decision No. 179 K/SIP/1961 and progressive interpretations of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, demonstrates that legal pluralism can be harmonized with international human rights standards. Pakistan’s experience further illustrates strong customary resistance to formal legal guarantees. This article concludes that integrating CEDAW standards with context-sensitive religious and customary interpretations offers a viable path toward substantive gender equality in inheritance law

References

Abdillah, D. H., & Yusron, M. (2025). Maqashid Syariah review of inheritance distribution practices from parents to children in the Betawi indigenous community of Kapuk Village: A socio-legal empirical study. Sahaja Journal Sharia and Humanities, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.61159/sahaja.v4i2.409

Agarwal, P. (2024). A tryst with succession rights: An impact assessment of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 on women landholders. Shimla Law Review, 5(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.70556/hpnlu-slr-v5-i1-2022-06

Ahmad, I., Alam, A., Khan, N., & Ullah, R. (2023). Inequality regimes, patriarchal connectivity, and women's right to property inheritance in rural Pakistan. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(1), 1251–1267. https://doi.org/10.2307/27158423

Alias, M. N., Abdullah, M. N., Osman, M. F., Ismail, N. F., & Kamis, M. S. (2025). The position of Maqasid Al-Shariah within Islamic legal sources: A comprehensive analysis. Samarah, 9(2), 937–964. https://doi.org/10.22373/q4byre51

Asnawi, H. S., & Ismail, H. (2020). Discrimination against wife in the perspective of CEDAW and Islam Mubādalah. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 20(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v20i2.253-268

Assaad, A. S., Hasyim, B., Ismail, A. M., & Kuba, A. (2023). Development model of gender equality study in the inheritance distribution of Tanah Luwu communities. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.215-240

Barlinti, Y. S. (2013). Inheritance legal system in Indonesia: A legal justice for people. Indonesia Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v3n1.28

Bhalotra, S., Roy, S., & Brulé, R. (2017). Women's inheritance rights reform and the preference for sons in India. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102539

Bhutia, D. (2018). A study of the status of personal laws in India with reference to Article 13 and judicial review under the Constitution of India [Doctoral thesis, University of North Bengal].

CEDAW Committee. (2010). General recommendation No. 28 on the core obligations of States Parties under Article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/28).

CEDAW Committee. (2013). General recommendation No. 29 on the economic consequences of marriage, family relations and their dissolution (UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/29).

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (GA Res. 34/180).

Dalimunte, P. U., Taufiq, M., Dewita, S., & Ningsih, S. F. (2026). Socio-cultural impressions in the interpretation of inheritance verses in Surah An-Nisa: Perspectives from Tafsir Al-Qur'an. Al Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 5(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v5i1.691

Dewi, F. P., & Valentina, T. D. (2025). Representation of inheritance rights in patriarchal culture in Bali based on gender equality theory. EGALITA Jurnal Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender, 20(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.18860/egalita.v20i1.32337

Fatima, H. (2022). Inheritance rights of orphaned grandchildren under Section 4 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, and its alternative solutions. Law and Policy Review, 3(2), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.32350/lpr.32.02

Fitriyati, Y., Ibrahim, D., Muntaqo, F., & Hasan, K. N. S. (2025). Reconsidering inheritance equality: Gender justice in religious court decisions through the lens of Maqashid Al-Shariah. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat, 25(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.27133

Gondal, A. Q., Shaukat, M., & Khan, H. (2023). Women's rights protection: Analysis of implementation of CEDAW and Beijing Declaration in Pakistan. Russian Law Journal, 11(5). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/womens-rights-protection-analysis-of-implementation-of-cedaw-and-beijing-declaration-in-pakistan

Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal pluralism: Concept, theoretical dialectics, and its existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review, 6(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566

Heriandita, S. M. P., Alwyni, F. F., Muttaqin, M. I., & Hannase, M. (2025). The role of Islamic inheritance law with a Maqasid Al-Shariah approach in addressing the challenges of social justice for women. AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i1.11931

India. (2005). Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act No. 39 of 2005).

Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) [Civil Code] (Staatsblad 1847 No. 23).

Indonesia. (1984). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1984 tentang Pengesahan CEDAW (Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1984 No. 29).

Indonesia. (1991). Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) [Compilation of Islamic Law] (Instruksi Presiden No. 1 Tahun 1991).

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1999 No. 165).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (GA Res. 2200A (XXI)).

Jamburi, A., & Muhibbin, M. (2024). Matrilineal system mechanism for the distribution of inheritance. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 2(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.285082

Julius, L., Sudirman, M., & Djaja, B. (2025). Analisis normatif terhadap hak waris perempuan dalam perspektif hukum Islam, hukum adat dan hukum perdata di Indonesia. Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan, 2(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.730

Kumar, S., & Sinha, N. (2019). Preventing more “missing girls”: A review of policies to tackle son preference. World Bank Research Observer, 35(1), 87–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkz002

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (1961). Putusan No. 179 K/SIP/1961.

Malik, Z., & Azam, S. (2023). Women, agency, religion, and law: Challenges of inheritance rights in Pakistan. Russian Law Journal, 11(2), 921–931. https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/3607

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum (Rev. ed.). Kencana.

Mubarak, M., Begum, J., Malik, U., & Malik, M. S. (2024). Women's empowerment through inheritance rights in Punjab, Pakistan: An analysis of state laws, policies, implementation gaps, and possibilities. Migration Letters, 21(S14), 1754–1766. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/download/12250/8077/29306

Nisar, A., & Cusairi, R. M. (2025). Islamic inheritance rights for women in Pakistan: Exploring legal safeguards and social challenges. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 15(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.151.09

Pakistan. (1961). Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (Ordinance No. VIII of 1961).

Permadi, I., & Muttaqin, I. (2023). Pemenuhan hak perempuan terhadap tanah warisan dalam sistem waris Bagi Rusa masyarakat Bangka. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7464

Putra, M., Ichwan, N., & Musyafak, N. (2025). Harmonisasi Maqāṣid Al-Syariah dengan CEDAW: Pendekatan dekonstruktif Abdullah Ahmed An-Naʾim dalam reformasi hukum Islam berbasis hak asasi perempuan. Restorasi Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/0zvq5x03

Ropiah, S. (2025). Integrasi nilai-nilai syariah dalam sistem kewarisan di era modern: Kajian terhadap keberlanjutan dan tantangannya. As-Salam Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 14(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v14i1.744

Salim, A. (2021). Adat and Islamic law in contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal coexistence and asymmetric contestation. Samarah, 5(2), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082

Saraswati, A. N. S. A. (2022). The discourse of reservations to CEDAW on women's rights in Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 19(4), 515–538. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol19.4.1

Schmidt, T. P. (2022). Judicial minimalism in the lower courts. Virginia Law Review, 108(4), 829–913.

Suharsono, A., Prasetyoningsih, N., & Usman, S. (2024). Women's inheritance rights in Indonesia from the perspective of the triangular concept of legal pluralism. El-Mashlahah, 14(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v14i2.7657

Tahir, T., & Hamid, S. H. A. (2024). Maqasid al-Syariʿah: Transformation in law implementation for humanity. International Journal Ihyaʾ ʿUlum al-Din, 26(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.26.1.20248

Taufiq, A. (2018). Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim tentang dekonstruksi syariah sebagai sebuah solusi. International Journal ʿUlum Al-Din, 20(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.20.2.4044

Thukral, V. (2025). Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005: A step towards formal or substantive equality? Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 7(6), 2656–2663. https://www.ijllr.com/post/hindu-succession-amendment-act-2005-a-step-towards-formal-or-substantive-equality

United Nations Development Group. (2003). The human rights-based approach to development cooperation: Towards a common understanding among UN agencies. United Nations.

Vijeyarasa, R. (2020). What is gender-responsive legislation? Using international law to establish benchmarks for labour, reproductive health and tax laws that work for women. Griffith Law Review, 29(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1853900

Wiwin, W. (2025). Contextualization of the Constitutional Court's decision on women's inheritance rights in customary and Islamic marriages. JULIA: Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 9–18. https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/download/710/403/

Yolanda, R. S. (2024). Perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan korban patriarki dalam warisan adat Batak Toba berdasarkan CEDAW. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 2(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v2i4.4131

Zaprulkhan, Z. (2018). Maqāṣid al-Shariah in the contemporary Islamic legal discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(2), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231

Zulfikar, Z., & Windani, S. (2024). Gender equality in inheritance distribution reviewed from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law. Journal of Gender and Social Inclusion in Muslim Societies, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30829/jgsims.v5i1.20499

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Kiswah, M. (2026). Daughters’ Inheritance Rights: Indonesian Legal Paradigms, Human Rights, and a Comparative Analysis with India and Pakistan. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 6(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i2.694
Loading...