Analysis of the Crime of Using Land Without the Right Permit Or His Proxy According to Law No 51/PRP/1960 Article 6 Paragraph 1 Connected with Decision Number 349/PID.C/PN Indramayu Year 2007

Abstract

Occupying/pessesing a piece of land is obtained through a personal struggle to persist in life and living. Based on that view, what known as the land’s eigendom is the compiled. This right service as the basis for regulating land law order which comprises how to respect and protect one’s acquirement to a piece of land as a result of hard, tough high risk struggle. The description above showed that a basic view highly determines the rules of law that among others concern on how the land’s meaning in relation to a person’s possesion. The law in society can be achieved if the law is acceptedand recognized by the society due to its benefits for the person individually as well as the society in general. The work of a criminal act of a land’s use without a legitimate permission from the rightful owner or his attorney is a violation to: article 6 Section (1) Of Act No.51/Prp/ 1960 which include elements as follow: whosoever occupy a piece of land; without permission from the rightfull owner or his legitimate attorney. Based on the above background, the writer has formulated and issue identification in this research as follows; What is to use without a permit according to the law no. 51/Prp/1960 can do efectif way of occupying a piece of land’s, What is the execution implemented by the judge in the verdict of no number 349/Pid.C/2007/PN Indramayu. The research method in this thesis is using the method of research normative juridical and analyzed deccriptively through library and field research and elaborated.